Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58960 (KAR)

SRI.ADINATH v. SHATTEPPA

MFA/103884/2016 · 2025-11-06

Chillakur Sumalatha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15194 MFA No. 103884 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 103884 OF 2016 (MV-I) BETWEEN: SRI. ADINATH S/O. VENKANAGOUDA PATIL, AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC: R/O: JUNJARWAD, TQ: ATHANI, DIST: BELAGAVI. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. M.C. HUKKERI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SHATTEPPA S/O. GAJAPPA KAMBALE, AGE: 26 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE & GOUNDI WORK, R/O: JAMBAGI B.K., TQ: JAMKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT. 2. BHARATESH JINNAPPA PATIL, AGE 35 YEARS, OCC: R/O: JUNJARWAD, TQ: JAMKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT. …RESPONDENTS (NOTICE TO R1 & R2 SERVED) THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MOTOR VEHICLE ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD PASSED BY COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALKOT TO SIT AT JAMAKHANDI AND MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, NO.XI, JAMKHANDI, AT: JAMKHANDI IN M.V.C. NO.208/2012 DATED 03.09.2015, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Digitally signed by GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DHARWAD - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15194 MFA No. 103884 of 2016 CORAM: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) Challenge in this appeal is the award that is passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-XI, Jamakhandi in MVC 208 of 2012 dated 03.09.2015. 2. Sri M.C.Hukkeri, learned counsel for the appellant submits that, the appellant is the owner of the offending vehicle which is involved in the accident. Though the appeal is filed challenging the quantum of amount that is awarded as compensation, now the appellant intends to satisfy the award and therefore necessary orders may be passed. 3. Having considered the submission that is made by learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant now intends to satisfy the award without any dispute regarding the contents of the order passed, this Court considers desirable to dismiss the appeal. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15194 MFA No. 103884 of 2016 4. Resultantly, the appeal stands dismissed. 5. Amount if any in deposit, be transmitted to the concerned tribunal immediately. Sd/- (CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE EM CT-MCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29