SMT RESHMA BHIMAPPA KAMBLE AFTER MARRIAGE RESHMA ASHOK KAMBLE v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
WP/107454/2023 · 2025-09-24
Suraj Govindaraj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 58945 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 58945 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13074 WP No. 107454 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 107454 OF 2023 (S-RES) BETWEEN:
SMT. RESHMA BHIMAPPA KAMBLE (AFTER MARRIAGE RESHMA ASHOK KAMBLE) AGE. 32 YEARS, OCC. UNEMPLOYED, R/O. BEVANUR, TQ. ATHANI, DIST. BELAGAVI 591212. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. AHAMED ALI J. RAHIMANSHA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER ANANKAK/ANASH APPOINTMENT SAMITI, BELAGAVI 590001.
2.
THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN AND CHILD WELFARE SECRETARY TO ANANKAK/ANASH APPOINTMENT SAMITI, BELAGAVI 590001.
3.
THE OFFICER OF THE CHILD WELFARE DEPARTMENT SECRETARY TO ANANKAK /ANASH APPOINTMENT SAMITI, BELAGAVI 590001.
4.
SMT. PAVITRA SHANKAR WANLGODI AGE. MAJOR, OCC. NIL,
5.
SMT. SUTHIR ZENDRERAR AGE. MAJOR, OCC. NIL,
Digitally signed by ASHPAK KASHIMSA MALAGALADINNI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13074 WP No. 107454 of 2023
BOTH ARE R/O. BEVANUR, TQ. ATHANI, DIST. BELAGAVI 591212. …RESPONDENTS
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO A WRIT OF CERTIORARI BE ISSUED TO QUASH THE SELECTION LIST OF ANGANWDI WORKER FOR KENDRA-2 OF S.C. COLONY, BEVANUR GRAMS, MALABAD, TQ. ATHANI, SELECTION OF THE RESPONDENT. NO. 4 MARKED AT ANNEXURE-B IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
CONSEQUENTLY, THE RESPONDENT BE DIRECTED TO SELECT THE PETITIONER FOR THE SAID POST OF ANGANWADI WORKER FOR KENDRA-2 OF S.C COLONY, BEVANUR GRAMS, MALABAD, TQ. ATHANI, IN THE INTEREST OF EQUITY AND CONSEQUENCE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)
1. Despite the order dated 10.09.2025, office objections have not been complied with.
2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
3. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
AM/CT:PA/ List No.: 3 Sl No.: 17