Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP- 14167-2025 -1- 125
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP- 14167-2025 Date of Decision: 16.05.2025
GEETA ..... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ....RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: Mr. S. K. Nehra, Advocate and Mr. Rahil Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner.
TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
, J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed inter alia seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to appoint the petitioner on the post of PGT, Commerce.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before respondents. At this stage, petitioner will be satisfied in case respondent no.2 is directed to decide her representation, dated 21.04.2025, Annexure P-11, in a specified period.
3. Notice of motion.
4. Mr. Harish Rathee, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents no. 1 and 2/State, and Seema 2025.05.19 10:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP- 14167-2025 -2- Mr. Kanwal Goyal, Advocate assisted by Ms. Sheena Dahiya, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondent no. 3/Commission. Learned State counsel submits that the representation, dated 21.04.2025, will be decided by respondent no.2/Director, Secondary Education Department by passing a speaking order in accordance with law within three months.
5. In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof.
6. Ordered accordingly.
7. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioner.
(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) 16.05.2025
JUDGE Sima Sima Sima Sima Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Seema 2025.05.19 10:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document