(1) 929sa111.95.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 929 SECOND APPEAL NO. 412 OF 1994 MARUTI NANA MANDE. ….Appellant VERSUS BHASKAR KISHANRAO KULKARNI. …..Respondent WITH SECOND APPEAL NO. 111 OF 1995 Mrs. Rekha Choudhari, Advocate for the appellant Mr. D. R. Bhadekar, Advocate for the respondent CORAM : ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. DATE : 23rd SEPTEMBER, 2025 PER COURT : SECOND APPEAL NO.111/1995 1. Pursuant to the order dated 04-08-2025, the learned advocate for the appellant in SA/111/1995, on instruction, makes a statement that this appeal has become infructuous. The appellant has executed the decree. Therefore, nothing survives in the SA/111/1995. 2. His statement is accepted. 3. In view of his statement, the second appeal No.111/1995 stands dismissed as infructuous. 1 of 2 2025:BHC-AUG:26087 (2) 929sa111.95.odt SECOND APPEAL NO.412/1994 1. The learned advocate for the appellant, in view of the order dated 08-01-1997 in CA/5927/1994, submitted that this SA/412/1994 has become infructuous. 2. She also pointed out the order passed in the CA/5927/1994. 3. In view of the same, the SA/412/1994 is dismissed as infructuous. [ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. ] VishalK/929sa111.95.odt 2 of 2