Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
H I G H C O U R T O F J A M M U & K A S H M I R A N D L A D A K H HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case No:- CPSW No 10/2018
Raj Kumar …..Petitioner(s)
Through: Ms. ManpreetKour, Advocate
Vs
Sanjeev Verma, Secy. G. A D and Anr. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Priyanka Bhat, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE
ORDER 16.05.2025
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that respondents/contemnors have in furtherance of the judgment and order passed by this Court, where under the instant contempt petition has arisen, passed a
consideration order, rejecting the claim of the petitioner which, as such,required to be called -in - question by the petitioner.
2. Having regard to the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the notice issued in the contempt petition is recalled and proceedings are closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out remedy against the
consideration order, if so, advised.
(Javed Iqbal Wani) Judge Jammu 16.05.2025 Javid Iqbal
Sr. No. 66