HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3411 of 1985 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Although learned AGA is present, no one appeared on behalf of appellants even in the revised list. 2. This appeal had been preferred by appellants, namely, Narpat and Udal under Section 374 of Cr.P.C. against judgment and order dated 17.12.1985 passed by learned VIII Additional Sessions Judge, Bulandshahar in Sessions Trial No.269 of 1983 convicting the appellants under Section 307/34 IPC with punishment of five years rigorous imprisonment. 3. Vide earlier order dated 19.08.2025, Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bulandshahar was directed to report regarding status of sole appellant. 4. In compliance of the said order, Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bulandshahar vide its report dated 30.08.2025, has apprised the Court that appellants had expired long ago. 5. In view of the report of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bulandshahar dated 30.08.2025, the appeal is liable to be dismissed as abated since the appellants had already been expired. 6. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed as having been abated. September 12, 2025 Rakesh Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : M.C. Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.G.A. (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Narpat And Others .....Appellant(s) State of U.P. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad