Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58906 (PNJ)

TARANJIT SINGH v. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR NORTH FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ORS

CWP/15189/2015 · 2025-04-21

Kuldeep Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-15189-2015 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 202 CWP-15189-2015 (O&M) Date of decision: 21.04.2025 Taranjit Singh ...Petitioner Versus Executive Director (North) Food Corporatioin of India and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. K.K. Gupta, Advocate for the respondents. **** KULDEEP TIWARI , J.(oral) 1. This Court vide order dated 19.02.2025 passed the hereinafter extracted order. “Written request for an adjournment has been circulated by the learned counsel for the petitioner despite the fact that earlier adjournment was granted subject to payment of Rs.2500/-. Neither there is any document on record to substantiate as to whether, the costs has been deposited or not, nor any one has caused appearance on behalf of the petitioner. However, in the interest of justice, another adjournment is granted subject to payment of additional costs of Rs.2500/- to be deposited with the District Legal Services Authority concerned. Adjourned to 21.4.2025.” 2. Again no one has caused appearance on behalf of the petitioner. As per the office report, no cost receipt has been filed. It seems that the SATYAWAN 2025.04.23 14:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-15189-2015 (O&M) 2 petitioner is not interested in pursuing the instant matter. It is already 3:45 p.m., therefore, further wait for petitioner's counsel is not justified, thus, the instant petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 21.04.2025 (KULDEEP TIWARI) Satyawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No SATYAWAN 2025.04.23 14:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document