MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, THR. ITS DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, WARDHA v. HORESHWAR S/O SHANKARRAO DEOGADE
WP/2196/2024 · 2025-07-29
Shri Sachin S Deshmukh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 58897 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 58897 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 letter 2282.25.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Letter OW No.2282/2025 in Writ Petition No.2196/2024 (D) MSRTC , Wardha V Horeshwar - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---------------------------- Mr. V.H. Kedar, Advocate for petitioner.
CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR
, J.
DATE : 11-11-2025. It is brought to the notice of the Court that Complaint (ULP) No.122/2023 was already decided by the Industrial Court within time and the compliance was placed on record. However, on 03-11-2025, Counsel for petitioner inadvertently submitted that the matter was listed for extension of time for deciding the said complaint case. On the basis of submissions, an order dated 03-11-2025 came to be passed granting extension of time.
2. It is now clarified that the Complaint (ULP) No.122/2023 is already decided and the compliance is required to be taken note of.
3. In view of this, order dated 03-11-2025 granting extension of time is of no relevance. The same is modified by clarifying that the Complaint (ULP) No.122/2023 is decided and compliance is noted. (Prafulla S. Khubalkar
, J. ) Deshmukh