Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58890 (KAR)

ARJUN S/O. SIDDAPPA SANTABANAVAR v. SMT. JAYALAXMI RAIKOD

CCC/100154/2024 · 2025-11-28

Addl Registrar Judicial

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CCC NO. 100154/2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD [ARJUN S/O. SIDDAPPA SANTABANAVAR AND ANOTHER VS. SMT. JAYALAXMI RAIKOD AND ANOTHER] 28.11.2025 ( PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIAL ORAL ORDER Case is called out. The learned Counsel for the Complainant is present and submits that, the case may be closed as it has become in fructuous. As per Order dated : 28.10.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections. As the memo is not filed for closing or withdrawal of the case, the case has to be dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the party is entitled to apply for setting aside the peremptory order by making an application to the Court having assignment of the subject. Hence, the following Order is passed by exercising the powers as per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules. ORDER The Contempt Petition filed by the Complainant under Sec.11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act – 1971 read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India is dismissed for non-compliance of the office objections, with no order as to costs. - 2 - CCC NO. 100154/2024 The Complainant is entitled to apply for setting aside this Order by making an application to the Court having assignment of the subject as per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3) of Karnataka High Court Rules, 1959. Sd/- [JERALD RUDOLPH MENDONCA] ADDL. REGISTRAR(JUDICIAL) & NOMINATED REGISTRAR. List No.: 56 Sl No.: 43