CWP-14087 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Ram Kishan and others State of Haryana and others CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. Manoj Makkar, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. DEEPAK SIBAL Learned counsel for the parties are in agreement that the challenge made Notification dated 23.08.2022 (Annexure P covered in their favour by a recent judgment of this Court dated 19.03.2025 passed in CWP and others’. Therefore, this prayer made by 2. In the petitioners shall now apply to the competent authority for change of mutation in the revenue record in terms of the Muqararidar (V 3. The afore application as and when made considered by the competent authority within one month filing, in accordance with law 4. Disposed of. May 15, 2025 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : of 2025 (O&M) Sr. No.131 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-14087 Date of Decision : and others Versus State of Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Manoj Makkar, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional A.G., Haryana and Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. *** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the parties are in agreement that made by the petitioners to the Haryana Government’s Gazette dated 23.08.2022 (Annexure P-4), the covered in their favour by a recent judgment of this Court dated 19.03.2025 passed in CWP-30195-2024 ‘Bhawar Singh and another Therefore, this prayer made by the petitioners is accepted. In light of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners shall now apply to the competent authority for change of mutation in the revenue record in terms of the Haryana Dholidar Vesting of Proprietary Rights) Amendment Act, 2018. The afore application as and when made considered by the competent authority within one month in accordance with law. Disposed of. (DEEPAK SIBAL JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No 31 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT of 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 15.05.2025 …Petitioners …Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI A.G., Haryana and Learned counsel for the parties are in agreement that with regard to Haryana Government’s Gazette ), the petitioners’ case would be covered in their favour by a recent judgment of this Court dated 19.03.2025 and another Vs. State of Haryana the petitioners is accepted. learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners shall now apply to the competent authority for change of mutation Haryana Dholidar, Butimar, Bhondedar and Rights) Amendment Act, 2018. The afore application as and when made by the petitioners would be considered by the competent authority within one month from the day of its DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2025.05.20 10:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document