Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58873 (KAR)

GOUSE MOHAMMAD S/O ISMAILSAB NADAF v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/103619/2025 · 2025-09-10

S Vishwajith Shetty

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11688 CRL.P No. 103619 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 103619 OF 2025 (439(CR.PC)/483(BNSS)) BETWEEN: GOUSE MOHAMMAD S/O ISMAILSAB NADAF, AGE. 40 YEARS, OCC. PLUMBER, R/O. LOKUR VILLAGE, NEAR MASJID, TQ. AND DIST. DHARWAD. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. I.Y. PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH HUBBALLI KESHWAPUR P.S., R/BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD. 2. SRI. GOUTHAM S/O KUMAR BETEGERI, AGE. 29 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE WORK, R/O. SONIAGANDHINAGAR, IIIRD CROSS, BIDNAL, TQ. HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD. … RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 OF CR.P.C. (UNDER SECTION 483 OF BNSS, 2023), PRAYING TO RELEASE PETITIONER/ACCUSED ON BAIL IN SPL. SC AND ST NO.7/2025 ARISING OUT OF HUBBALLI KESHWAPUR P.S. CRIME NO.222/2024, FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 309(4) AND 103(1) OF BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 AND UNDER SECTION 3(2)(V) OF SC AND ST (P.O.A) AMENDMENT ACT, 2015 PENDING ON THE FILE OF IIND ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DHARWAD AND SPECIAL COURT FOR TRIAL OF THE OFFENCES UNDER P.O.C.S.O. ACT AND S.C.S.T. (P.O.A) ACT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. RAKESH S HARIHAR Digitally signed by RAKESH S HARIHAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11688 CRL.P No. 103619 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER IS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission of this Court withdraw the petition. 2. The submission and the memo is taken on record. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file appeal as provided under law. Sd/- (S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE VMB CT:BCK LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 32