RUKSHANA BANO v. STATE TH.EDUCATION DEPTT.AND ORS.
SWP/386/2014 · 2025-08-19
Vinod Chatterji Koul
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5887 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5887 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 26
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case: SWP 386/2014
Rukshana Bano …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through: None
V/s
State & Ors. ... Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Pawan Dev Singh, Dy.AG
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
ORDER 19.08.2025
There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on the preceding two dates of hearing. Today also the matter was called twice but nobody has chosen to appear. It appears that either the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed or he has lost interest in prosecuting the same. In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL)
JUDGE Jammu 19.08.2025 AKHILESH