Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010113002023 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/864/2025 BABUL AHMED SODIOL AND ANR. S/O- LATE SUNGUL MIA SODIOL R/O- NARAYANPUR PART III P.O- NARAYANPUR P.S- HAILAKANDI DIST- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 2: MUSSTT. RUSHNA BEGUM SODIOL S/O- LATE SUNGUL MIA SODIOL R/O- NARAYANPUR PART III P.O- NARAYANPUR P.S- HAILAKANDI DIST- HAILAKANDI ASSAM VERSUS NIZAM UDDIN LASKAR AND 3 ORS. S/O SUNAHAR ALI LASKAR R/O NARAYANPUR PART-III PS. AND DISTRICT HAILAKANDI ASSAM 2:NUR AHMED SODIOL S/O- LATE SUNGUL MIA SODIOL Page No.# 2/2 3:AINUL HOQUE SODIOL S/O- LATE SUNGUL MIA SODIOL 4:AKIRUN NESSA SODIOL W/O- LATE LATE ABDUL HOQUE TARAPDAR ALL ARE R/O- NARAYANPUR PART III P.S- HAILAKANDI DIST- HAILAKANDI ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR. R PHUKAN Advocate for : appearing for NIZAM UDDIN LASKAR AND 3 ORS. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN ORDER Date :28.03.2025 Heard Mr. R. Phukan, learned counsel for the applicants. 2. This interlocutory application is preferred for by the applicants for granting them permission to file amended memo of appeal. 3. However, it appears from the order dated 31.07.2024, passed in RSA No. 140/2024, that Mr. Phukan has already been permitted by this Court to file amended memo of appeal, and as such, this interlocutory application has become infructuous. 4. Accordingly, this I.A. stands closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant