K T VENKATRAMA REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/32925/2025 · 2025-11-27
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 58862 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 58862 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010634642025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 32925/2025 Between:
1. K T VENKATRAMA REDDY, S/O LATE K.THIMMA REDDY, AGE ABOUT 75 YEARS. 2. SMT.NAGARATHNAMMA, W/O LATE K.T.JAYARAMI REDDY, AGE ABOUT 60 YEARS. 3. K.DASARATHI RAGHURAM, S/O LATE K.T.JAYARAMI REDDY, AGE ABOUT 40 YEARS,
4. J.VENUGOPAL, S/O LATE K.T.JAYARAMI REDDY, AGE ABOUT 37 YEARS. 5. SMT.L.ARUNA KUMARI, W/O LATE K.T.GOPAL REDDY, AGE ABOUT 47 YEARS. G.SURENDRA REDDY S/O LATE K.T.GOPAL REDDY. 6. G.SURENDRA REDDY, S/O LATE K.T.GOPAL REDDY. K.SUVARNA D/O LATE K.T.GOPAL REDDY, AGE ABOUT 25 YEARS. ALL THE PETITIONERS ARE RESIDENT OF KONERU KUPPAM VILLAGE AND POST, SANTHIPURAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. THE DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER-CUM- SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT AT CHITTOOR
2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. THE DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT AT CHITTOOR
3. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICERCUMDEPUTY, SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KUPPAM SUB- DIVISION AT KUPPAM, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RALLABADUGURU POLICE STATION AT RALLABADUGURU, SANTHIPURAM MANDAL,
2
CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5.
SRI K RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, S/O LATE K.NARAYANA REDDY, AGE ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O KONERU KUPPAM VILLAGE AND POST, SANTHIPURAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the official respondents in trying to interfere into the civil dispute in respect of the petitioners properties i.e., (i) Ac.0-332 cents in LP.No.538, (ii) Ac.01-24 cents in LP.No.617, (iii) Ac.1- 493 cents in LP.No.622 and (iv) Ac.0-612 cents in LP.No.746, total Ac.03-677 cents in Sy.No.78/3, an extent of 0-15 cents in Sy.No.20/3 and Ac.0-14 cents in Sy.No.21/16, situated at Koneru Kuppam Revenue Village, Santhipuram Mandal, Chittoor District, in the guise of orders passed in WP.No.13334 of 2025, as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the official respondents/police not to interfere into the civil disputes in respect of the petitioners properties i.e., (i) Ac.0-332 cents in LP.No.538, (ii) Ac.01-24 cents in LP.No.617, (iii) Ac.1-493 cents in LP.No.622 and (iv) Ac.0-612 cents in LP.No.746, total Ac.03-677 cents in Sy.No.78/3, an extent of 0-15 cents in Sy.No.20/3 and Ac.0-14 cents in Sy.No.21/16, situated at Koneru Kuppam Revenue Village, Santhipuram Mandal, Chittoor District, and to pass
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. K V L NARASIMHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
3
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioners for the following relief:
“ ... to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the official respondents in trying to interfere into the civil dispute in respect of the petitioners properties i.e., (i) Ac.0-332 cents in LP.No.538, (ii) Ac.01-24 cents in LP.No.617, (iii) Ac.1- 493 cents in LP.No.622 and (iv) Ac.0-612 cents in LP.No.746, total Ac.03-677 cents in Sy.No.78/3, an extent of 0-15 cents in Sy.No.20/3 and Ac.0-14 cents in Sy.No.21/16, situated at Koneru Kuppam Revenue Village, Santhipuram Mandal, Chittoor District, in the guise of orders passed in WP.No.13334 of 2025, as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the official respondents/police not to interfere into the civil disputes in respect of the petitioners properties i.e., (i) Ac.0-332 cents in LP.No.538, (ii) Ac.01-24 cents in LP.No.617, (iii) Ac.1-493 cents in LP.No.622 and (iv) Ac.0-612 cents in LP.No.746, total Ac.03-677 cents in Sy.No.78/3, an extent of 0-15 cents in Sy.No.20/3 and Ac.0-14 cents in Sy.No.21/16, situated at Koneru Kuppam Revenue Village, Santhipuram Mandal, Chittoor District, and to pass ...”
Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. Perused the material on record.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home placed on written instructions and would submit that with regard to the present dispute, petitioners have already filed a civil suit before concerned Civil Court and the matter is pending for adjudication, Police never interfered in the civil disputes, police recorded the statement of respondent No.5 that they will settle the matter before the Court of law and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders.
Learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of.
4
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Respondent Police are
directed to follow due process of law with regard to the subject matter. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* Dinesh
5
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Writ Petition No. 32925 of 2025
28.11.2025
Mjl /* Dinesh