Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010008952015 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/878/2015 KALYAN RAJKHOWA S/O LT. UPENDRA NATH RAJKHOWA, R/O KAPTON CHUK, HIJUGURI, DIST- TINSUKIA, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS REP. BY THE SECY. TO GOVT. OF ASSAM, REVENUE LR DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY-6 2:THE DY. SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM REVENUE LR DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI 3:THE DY. COMMISSIONER CUM COLLECTOR TINSUKIA ASSAM 4:TINSUKIA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TINSUKIA B.P.CHALIHA NAGAR P.O. AND P.S. TINSUKIA DISTRICT TINSUKIA ASSAM 5:THE CHAIRMAN TINSUKIA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY B.P. CHALIHA NAGAR P.O. AND P.S. TINSUKIA Page No.# 2/3 DIST. TINSUKIA ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.C BARUAH, MR.D BARUAH,MR.B BARUAH Advocate for the Respondent : MR.A K GUPTA, GA, ASSAM(R1-3),MR.K AGARWAL,MR. A K GUPTA (R-4 & 5) Linked Case : WP(C)/198/2015 BHORAT GOHAIN S/O LT. PESBOR GOHAIN R/O LAIPOLI CAPTAIN VILLAGE P.O. LAIPULI DIST- TINSUKIA ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS REP. BY THE SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM REVENUE LR DEPTT. DISPUR GHY-6 2:DY. SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM REVENUE LR DEPTT. DISPUR GHY-6 3:ADDL. DY. COMMISSIONER LA TINSUKIA 4:DY. COMMISSIONER CUM COLLECTOR TINSUKIA ASSAM 5:TINSUKIA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TINSUKIA B.P. CHALIHA NAGAR P.O.AND P.S. TINSUKIA DIST. TINSUKIA Page No.# 3/3 ASSAM. 6:THE CHAIRMAN TINSUKIA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY B.P. CHALIA NAGAR P.O. AND P.S. AND DIST. TINSUKIA ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR.B BARUAH Advocate for : appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 28-01-2025 None appears for the petitioner on call. It is noticed that on 10.12.2024 also none represented the petitioners. Ms. N. Bordoloi, learned standing counsel, Revenue Department for the respondent No.1 and 2, Mr. B.J. Talukdar, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate for the respondent No.3 and Mr. A.K. Gupta, learned counsel for the respondents No. 4 and 4 are present. It appears that the petitioners are no longer interest to pursue these matters. The matters are pending since 2015 and listed for hearing on two occasions, on which dates, the petitioners remain unrepresented. Considering above, both the writ petitions stand dismissed for non-prosecution. Interim order, if any, passed earlier stands vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant