Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5885 (HP)

RAHUL SHARMA v. AKANKSHA SHARMA

CMPMO/217/2025 · 2025-07-24

Ajay Mohan Goel

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2023:HHC:5863 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No.216 of 2025 a/w CMPMO No.217 of 2025 Decided on: 24.07.2025 CMPMO No.216 of 2025 Akanksha Sharma … Petitioner Versus Rahul Sharma … Respondent CMPMO No.217 of 2025 Rahul Sharma … Petitioner Versus Akanksha Sharma … Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________ _ For the petitioner : Mr. Deepak Kaushal, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Abhishek Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner, in CMPMO No.216 of 2025. Mr. J.R. Poswal, Advocate, for the petitioner, in CMPMO No.217 of 2025. For the respondents : Mr. J.R. Poswal, Advocate, for the respondent, in CMPMO No.216 of 2025. Mr. Deepak Kaushal, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Abhishek Verma, Advocate, for the respondent, in CMPMO No.217 of 2025. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2023:HHC:5863 into consideration the fact that the parties have approached the Court against the interim maintenance order passed by the learned Court below, these proceedings are closed, with the observation that learned Court below may make an endeavour to pass final order in the application as expeditiously as possible. The parties are at liberty to lead additional evidence to substantiate their respective contentions in the course of the adjudication of the application filed by them. 2. The petitions stand disposed of. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 24, 2025 (Rishi)