IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 108 Ravichandran and others Sh. Amit Chandigarh and others CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) proceedings against the respondent(s) for not complying the order dated 05.6.2024 Court in CWP Chandigarh and others” vide which while issuing notice of motion, the petition (CWP the connected petition i.e. CWP granted in the same terms as in CWP of the impugned letter/Memo dated 28.4.2024 (annexed as Annexure P-13 in that petition) qua the petitioners was ordered to be stayed. COCP-2448-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2448 of 2025 Date of decision : Ravichandran and others Versus Sh. Amit Kumar, Commissioner, IAS, Municipal Corporation, Chandigarh and others CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Rajender Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Deepali Puri, Advocate with Mr. Arjun Dhaliwal, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3. None for respondent No.4. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent(s) for not complying the order 05.6.2024 (Annexure P-1) passed by a co Court in CWP-14417-2024 titled as “Ravichandran and others vs. UT Chandigarh and others” vide which while issuing notice of motion, the petition (CWP-14417-2024) was ordered to be heard alongwith the connected petition i.e. CWP-13683-2024 and granted in the same terms as in CWP-13683 of the impugned letter/Memo dated 28.4.2024 (annexed as Annexure 13 in that petition) qua the petitioners was ordered to be stayed. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2448 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-30.07.2025 …..Petitioners Kumar, Commissioner, IAS, Municipal Corporation, …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Rajender Kumar, Advocate Ms. Deepali Puri, Advocate with Mr. Arjun Dhaliwal, Advocate Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent(s) for not complying the order 1) passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Ravichandran and others vs. UT Chandigarh and others” vide which while issuing notice of motion, 2024) was ordered to be heard alongwith 2024 and interim order was 13683-2024, in which operation of the impugned letter/Memo dated 28.4.2024 (annexed as Annexure 13 in that petition) qua the petitioners was ordered to be stayed. VIJAY ASIJA 2025.07.31 09.37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Dharminder Sharma, Superintending Engineer (B & R), Municipal Corporation, Chandigarh has been filed in the Court today. The same is taken on record. Alongwith the said reply, copy of the Office Order No.33 dated 23.7.2025 passed by Corporation, Chandigarh in favour of the petitioner(s) has been annexed as Annexure R opposite. Contempt Petition bearing COCP Jayapuri and others vs. Sh. Amit Kumar, Commissioner, IAS, Municipal Corporation, Chandigarh and others”, in which similar issue was raised, has been decided by a co Court vide order dated 10.7.2025. Cop over in the Court, which is taken on record. of the aforesaid position, the present contempt petition may be disposed of in terms of COCP petitioners as well as the fact that as per the short reply filed on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3, the necessary compliance has been made by the respondent 23.7.2025 (Annexure R in the present petition, the same is COCP-2448-2025 (O & M) Short reply dated 24.7.2025 by way Dharminder Sharma, Superintending Engineer (B & R), Municipal Corporation, Chandigarh has been filed in the Court today. The same is taken on record. Alongwith the said reply, copy of the Office Order No.33 dated 23.7.2025 passed by the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Chandigarh in favour of the petitioner(s) has been annexed as Annexure R-1. Copy thereof is supplied to the counsel Learned counsel for the parties also submit that a Contempt Petition bearing COCP-2498-2025, titled as “Jaya Gudi @ Jayapuri and others vs. Sh. Amit Kumar, Commissioner, IAS, Municipal Corporation, Chandigarh and others”, in which similar issue was raised, has been decided by a co Court vide order dated 10.7.2025. Copy of the said order is handed over in the Court, which is taken on record. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the aforesaid position, the present contempt petition may be disposed of in terms of COCP-2498-2025. Heard. In view of the request made by learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the fact that as per the short reply filed on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3, the necessary compliance has been made by the respondent-authority while passing a Speaking Order dated 23.7.2025 (Annexure R-1), no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition, the same is disposed of Rule stands discharged. 2 Short reply dated 24.7.2025 by way of affidavit of Shri Dharminder Sharma, Superintending Engineer (B & R), Municipal Corporation, Chandigarh has been filed in the Court today. The same is taken on record. Alongwith the said reply, copy of the Office Order the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Chandigarh in favour of the petitioner(s) has been 1. Copy thereof is supplied to the counsel Learned counsel for the parties also submit that a 2025, titled as “Jaya Gudi @ Jayapuri and others vs. Sh. Amit Kumar, Commissioner, IAS, Municipal Corporation, Chandigarh and others”, in which similar issue was raised, has been decided by a co-ordinate Bench of this y of the said order is handed over in the Court, which is taken on record. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the aforesaid position, the present contempt petition may be 2025. ew of the request made by learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the fact that as per the short reply filed on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3, the necessary compliance has been made by authority while passing a Speaking Order dated 1), no further orders are required to be passed disposed of accordingly. VIJAY ASIJA 2025.07.31 09.37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document July 30, 202 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-2448-2025 (O & M) Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 3 Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.07.31 09.37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document