1 2025:CGHC:55402 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 12655 of 2025 • Dharmin Bai D/o Sitaram Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Dhobghatti, Post Baigakapa, Tahsil Lalpur Thana,district Mungeli C.G. ... Petitioner versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Women And Child Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur C.G. 2. Collector, District Mungeli C.G. 3. Project Officer, I.C.D.S. Lormi, District Mungeli C.G. 4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Lormi, District Mungeli C.G. 5. Priti Kashyap W/o Dujram Aged About 20 Years R/o Village Dhobghatti, Post Baigakapa, Tahsil Lalpur Thana, District Mungeli C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikhyat Arora, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Santosh Bharat, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 13.11.2025 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 23.05.2025 passed by the respondent No. 2 arising out of the final selection MANISH YADAV Digitally signed by MANISH YADAV Date: 2025.11.20 11:20:23 +0530 2 dated 06.10.2023 respondent No. 3 by which the appeal preferred by the petitioner under Section 91 of the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam has been dismissed by the respondent No. 2. 2. Learned State counsel would submit that the petitioner has remedy of filing second appeal/revision against the order passed by the Collector under the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam. 3. Since the petitioner has remedy of filing second appeal/revision against the order passed by the Collector under the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, therefore, the writ petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to prefer revision challenging the order dated 06.10.2023 and 23.05.2025 passed by the Collector, District - Mungli (C.G.). 4. It is made clear that the petitioner shall file the second appeal/revision within 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order and neither the appellate authority nor the revisional authority or the respondent shall take plea of limitation and would decide the appeal/revision on merit without insisting for delay. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Manish