Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58845 (AP)

Pindekanti Shamsheer Basha, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/7689/2024 · 2025-11-27

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010148342024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 7689/2024 Between: PINDEKANTI SHAMSHEER BASHA, S/O P. BABA FAKRUDDIN, AGED- 32 YEARS, OCC- PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O. D-NO. 28-3-953, VINCENT FERROR NAGAR, ANANTAPUR. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT., 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPUR DIVISION, ANANTAPUR. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ANANTAPUR I TOWN POLICE STATION, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. GOUTHAMI SURAPAREDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in opening and continuing rowdy sheet rowdy sheet R.S.No. 697against the petitioner in 4th respondent Police Station as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also ultra vires the Police Standing Order 742 consequently direct the respondents to close the Rowdy sheet vide 2 Rowdy sheet R.S.No. 697 maintained against the petitioner taken by the respondents.” 2. Sri Gouthami Surapareddy, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, no cases are pending against the Petitioner and hence, the impugned rowdy sheet may be set aside. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that there are no cases pending against the Petitioner. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is allowed and the impugned Rowdy Sheet against the Petitioner is hereby set aside. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:28.11.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.7689 of 2024 Dt.28.11.2025 Dinesh