Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58843 (KAR)

SMT V B VEENA W/O V B SIVANAND v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/100358/2024 · 2025-11-28

Anant Ramanath Hegde

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:16682 WP No. 100358 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 100358 OF 2024 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. V.B. VEENA W/O V.B. SIVANAND, AGE. 29 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE, R/O. NANDIHALLI VILLAGE, TQ. HOOVINAHADAGALI, DIST. VIJAYANAGAR, PIN-583 219. 2. SMT. V.B. BASAMMA, AGE. 61 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE, R/O. NANDIHALLI VILLAGE, TQ. HOOVINAHADAGALI, DIST. VIJAYANAGAR, PIN-583 219. … PETITIONERS (BY SRI. ANAND R. KOLLI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU, PIN-560 001. CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Date: 2025.11.29 11:19:34 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:16682 WP No. 100358 of 2024 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, HARAPANAHALLI SUB DIVISION, HARAPANAHALLI, PIN-583 219. 3. THE TAHSILDAR HADALGI, TQ. HADALGI, PIN-583 219. 4. THE PDO, GRAM PANCHAYAT NANDIHALLI VILLAGE, TQ. HOOVINHADAGALI, DIST. VIJAYANAGAR, PIN-583 219. … RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. MALA B. BHUTE, AGA FOR R1 TO R3; SRI. V. SHIVARAJ HIREMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER NO.PÀA/¥ÀºÀtÂ/C¦Ã®Ä/195/2013-14 Dgï J (ºÀqÀUÀ°) / ¹Dgï / 264 / 2019 ¢£ÁAPÀ 28.11.2023 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 AUTHORITY MARKED AS ANNEXURE-J IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:16682 WP No. 100358 of 2024 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the petition to avail the appellate remedy. 2. Submission is placed on record. 3. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Liberty is reserved to the petitioners to approach the Appellate Authority. 5. The time spent in prosecuting the petition from 05.01.2024 till today has to be excluded in computing the limitation. 6. Registry to return the copy of the impugned order to the petitioner after retaining the Xerox copy. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE CLK CT:BCK LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 4