MINAKSHI SHARMA. v. FAROOQ AHMAD SHAH,COMMR.SECY.SCHOOL EDU.DEPTT. AND ANR.
CPSW/749/2017 · 2025-03-05
Rajnesh Oswal
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5884 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5884 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 749/2017 in SWP No. 217/2013
Minakshi Sharma
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate.
vs
Farooq Ahmad Shah, Commissioner Secy. School Education Dept. and another .…. Respondent(s)
Through: None.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER 05.03.2025
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order, non compliance of which has been reported to this Court, stands complied with the by the respondents.
2. His statement is taken on record.
3. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the contempt proceedings are closed and the instant contempt petition is accordingly disposed of.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE
Jammu 05.03.2025 Sahil Padha
Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No.
Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No. Serial No. 31 Sahil Padha 2025.03.05 16:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document