r IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY. THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 32350 OF 201.? Between: 1. C.Vijaya Lakshmi, W/o.A.Paratneswar, Age:42 Years, Occ:Anganwadi Worker, R/o.Kurugunta Village, Anantapur Mandal, Anantapur District. 2. P Prameelamma, W/o.R.Ratnaiah, Age:43 Years, Occ:Anganwadi Worker, R/o.Mandleru Village, Jupadu Banglow, Kurnool District. ...Petitioners AND 1. The Govt, of A.P., Rep. by its PrI. Secretary, Women and child Welfare Development, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Commissioner, Women and Child Welfare Department 3. The Regional Joint Director, Rayalasima Region, Women and Child Welfare Department. Kurnool. 4. The Regional Deputy Director, Rayalasima Region, Women and Child Welfare Department, Kurnool. Hyderabad. ...Respondents praying that in may or order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in declaring the examination results as invalid answer sheet Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue appropriate writ one relating to the post of Extension Officer Grade-ll (Supervisor) in the Department of WD & CW held on 4-8-2013 in the 3rd respondent Region is illegal, arbitrary, in violation of principles of natural justice and in violation of Art. 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India consequently direct the respondents to declare the number of marks secured by the petitioners in written examination and further direct the respondent to consider the of the petitioners for the post of Extension Officer Grade-ll (Supervisor) per eligibility in the interest of justice. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP. NO: 40217 OF 20131 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to furnish the answer sheets to the petitioners and considered the petitioners objections about the selections to the post of Extension Officer Grade-ll (Supervisor) in the interest of justice. case as Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI. K NARSI REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR WOMEN DEV, CHILD WELFARE The Court made the following order: ^ ■ APHC010052612013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] k:: THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 32350/2013 Between; C.vijaya Lakshmi, and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The Govt Of A P and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitloner(S): 1.KNARSI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR WOMENDEV, CHILDWELFARE 2.ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following: ■ 2 Order- Notice sent by this Court is served on the petitioners. The 1®* petitioner is represented by the Counsel and the 2^^^ petitioner is appeared in person. The learned counsel for the 1®* petitioner submits that the petitioner is working as Anganwadi Worker from the year 1999 and the 2'^'^ petitioner is also working as Anganwadi Worker from the year 1992. The petitioners appeared for the post of Extension Officer Grade-11 (Supervisor) in the 2 respondent Department and they appeared for examination held on 04.08.2013. It is submitted that both the petitioners’ hall tickets were issued 2. nd and they appeared. However, the respondents have not considered the petitioners as their 3. answer sheets were found invalid. The print out of the E-Seva Portal whereby it is informed that, the petitioners’ answer sheets were found invalid. No counter is filed and there is no representation for the respondents 4. today. nd The 1®‘ petitioner has been working from the last 25 years and the 2 petitioner was working from the last 32 years as Angawandi Workers. The respondents shall consider the case of the petitioners for further promotion as Extension Officer Grade-11 (Supervisor). The petitioners shall make a representation to the concerned respondent to consider their cases, keeping in view their long service. The respondents are directed to pass necessary orders in accordance with law, within a period of six (06) weeks 5. 6. from the date of such representation. 3 With these observations, this Writ Petition is disposed off. There shall 7. be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- B PRASADA RAO assistant ^^istrar / //TRUE COPY// To 1. The PrI. Secretary, Women and child Welfare Development, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Commissioner, Women and Child Welfare Department, Hyderabad. 3. The Regional Joint Director, Rayalasima Region, Women and Child Welfare Department, Kurnool. 4. The Regional Deputy Director, Rayalasima Region, Women and Child Welfare Department, Kurnool. 5. One CC to Sri. K Narsi Reddy Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP for Women Dev, Child Welfare, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 7. Two CCs to AddI Advocate General, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 8. Three CD Copies GSC # HIGH COURT DATED:02/01/2025 ORDER WP.No.32350 of 2013 ^roFANoJ^ . 0 I FEB 2025 V* Current SecUon O //a: '\o DISPOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS