Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
118 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-14293-2025 Date of Decision:28.05.2025 BALBIR SINGH ...Petitioner Vs.
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present: Mr. B.S. Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. T.P.S. Chawla, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
, J.
(Oral)
1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for quashing the impugned speaking order dated 26.03.2025 (Annex. P-2) whereby claim of the petitioner for payment of interest on delayed payment of leave encashment, GIS @ 12% per annum has been declined.
2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner intends to approach the higher authorities for redressal of his grievance and prays that the present petition may kindly be
disposed of having been not pressed any further.
3. Ordered accordingly.
(HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE 28.05.2025 kv Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No KUMUD VERMA 2025.05.29 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh