IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Naveen Sharma @ Naveen Kumar and State of Haryana CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. for the petitioners. Mr. DEEPAK SIBAL Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Financial Commissioner No.1 to take a decision on the made on behalf of the petitioners. 2. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. 3. Accordingly, at this stage, case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. decision on the of the petitioners, by passing a speaking order and hearing to all concerned, preferably within two a copy of this order. 4. Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioners and if the decision is not to the sati would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. May 15, 2025 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : Sr. No.124 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-14047 Date of Decision : Naveen Sharma @ Naveen Kumar and others …Petitioner Versus Haryana and others …Respondent HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate, or the petitioners. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. *** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Financial Commissioner-cum-Secretary to Government of Haryana to take a decision on the representation dated made on behalf of the petitioners. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. decision on the representation dated 07.05.2025 (Annexure P of the petitioners, by passing a speaking order and hearing to all concerned, preferably within two weeks a copy of this order. Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioners and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioners, they would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. (DEEPAK SIBAL JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 14047-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 15.05.2025 …Petitioners …Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Secretary to Government of Haryana, respondent dated 07.05.2025 (Annexure P-4), Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to take a (Annexure P-4), made on behalf of the petitioners, by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of weeks from the date of receipt of Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the sfaction of the petitioners, they would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2025.05.16 17:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document