APHC010631842025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 32636/2025 Between: 1. KORNI BANGARAMMA, W/O THATHABBAI, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RESIDING AT GURRAJUPETA VILLAGE, H/O GUDIVADA VILLAGE, S. RAYAVARAM MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANAKAPALLI, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER S H O, S. RAYAVARAM POLICE STATION, S. RAYAVARAM ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, S. RAYAVARAM MANDAL ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 5. CHOPPA RAMANAMMA, W/O SATHYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS RESIDING AT GURRAJUPETA VILLAGE, H/O.GUDIVADA VILLAGE, S.RAYAVARAM MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No. 3 and 4 in interfering in the civil dispute pertaining to an extent of Ac 2.00 cents in Sy.No.138 of Gurrajupeta Village, S. Rayavaram Mandal, Anakapalli District, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No. 3 and 4 not to interfere with the petitioner property i.e., to an extent of Ac 2.00 cents in Sy.No.138 of Gurrajupeta Village, S. Rayavaram Mandal, Anakapalli District and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NANILU NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief: “ ... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No. 3 and 4 in interfering in the civil dispute pertaining to an extent of Ac 2.00 cents in Sy.No.138 of Gurrajupeta Village, S. Rayavaram Mandal, Anakapalli District, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No. 3 and 4 not to interfere with the petitioner property i.e., to an extent of Ac 2.00 cents in Sy.No.138 of Gurrajupeta Village, S. Rayavaram Mandal, Anakapalli District and pass ...” Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Learned Assistant Government Pleader placed on record written instructions and would submit that basing on the complaint given by respondent No.5, a case was registered was registered against the Petitioner, as per the letter addressed by the respondent Police, Tahsildar, S.Rayavaram Mandal furnished a letter stating that necessary action will be taken to prevent further interference or trespass into the subject land by the Petitioner, for that purpose, the parties were summoned to appear before the Mandal Executive Magistrate, S.Rayavaram Mandal for binding over proceedings, subsequently, bonds were executed on both parties and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders. 3 Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Respondent Police are directed to follow due process of law with regard to the subject matter. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 32636 of 2025 28.11.2025 Mjl /*