Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:56208
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 431 of 2023 1 - Chandrakala Ghritlahre W/o Sunil Kumar Ghritlahare, Aged About 40 Years R/o Magaruchhala, District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
--- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Chief Secretary, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - High Court Of Chhattisgarh Through - Its Registrar General, Chhattisgarh High Court, Bodri, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
--- Respondent(s) WPS No. 586 of 2023 1 - Yamuna Bai Dubey W/o Mageshkar Dubey Aged About 33 Years R/o Lalbahadur Shashtri, Ward No. 8, Bodri, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.
---Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Chief Secretary, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - High Court Of Chhattisgarh. Through- Its Registrar General, Chhattisgarh High Court, Bodri, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ABHIGYA SAXENA Digitally signed by ABHIGYA SAXENA
2
--- Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Deepali Gupta, Advocate For State : Mr. Rahul Tamaskar, Government Advocate For Respondent : Mr. Yashraj Verma, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Amrito Das, Advocate Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 18.11.2025
1. During the course of hearing, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause of action no longer survives, and in view of subsequent developments, the petitions have been rendered infructuous.
2. Learned counsel for the respondent does not dispute the same and has no objection to the petition being dismissed as infructuous.
3. In view of the above, and since nothing further survives for adjudication, the petitions are dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Saxena