IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (114) Ramesh Chander State of Haryana CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. the Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a writ of warranto for quashing the appointment of the private respondent No.5 Female Consta 2. private respondent No.5, against whom, a writ of sought, has not been given an occupied by the private respondent No.5, petition is a misconceived and premature motion. 3. to withdraw the instant writ petition, at this stage, with liberty to re Court afresh, in case, the cause of action accrues in future. 4. withdrawn, July 08, 2025 Manpreet IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Ramesh Chander Versus State of Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Jasbir Singh Mor, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Bhupender Singh, Addl. AG, Haryana for respondents No.1 to 4. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(ORAL) Through the instant writ petition, cast under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a writ of for quashing the appointment of the private respondent No.5 Female Constable. During the course of the arguments, it has come on record that private respondent No.5, against whom, a writ of sought, has not been given any appointment, or any other public post is occupied by the private respondent No.5, petition is a misconceived and premature motion. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the instant writ petition, at this stage, with liberty to re Court afresh, in case, the cause of action accrues in future. Consequently, the instant writ peti , with the liberty as aforesaid, at this stage. , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-14337-2025 Date of Decision : 08.07.2025 …Petitioner Versus ...Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI Advocate h, Addl. AG, Haryana Through the instant writ petition, cast under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a writ of quo for quashing the appointment of the private respondent No.5, as During the course of the arguments, it has come on record that private respondent No.5, against whom, a writ of quo warranto has been appointment, or any other public post is so far, therefore, the instant writ petition is a misconceived and premature motion. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the instant writ petition, at this stage, with liberty to re-access this Court afresh, in case, the cause of action accrues in future. Consequently, the instant writ petition is dismissed as with the liberty as aforesaid, at this stage. (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No : Yes/No Through the instant writ petition, cast under Articles 226/227 of quo , as During the course of the arguments, it has come on record that has been appointment, or any other public post is therefore, the instant writ At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission access this ismissed as MANPREET SINGH 2025.07.09 17:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment