Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58820 (PNJ)

SATNAM KAUR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/5146/2025 · 2025-05-19

Sukhvinder Kaur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 120 CRWP-5146-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 19.05.2025. Satnam Kaur ...Petitioner. Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents. *** CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR ....... Present: Ms. Sushma Chopra, Advocate for the petitioner. *** SUKHVINDER KAUR , J. (Oral) Prayer in the instant petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India is for issuance of directions to respondents No.1 to 4 to protect the life and personal liberty of the petitioner at the hands of respondents No.5 to 9, by providing adequate security/ police protection to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the civil litigation is already pending between the parties as the respondents dispossessed the petitioner forcibly from the land in question and stated that earlier a false FIR had been registered against the husband and son of the petitioner for harvesting the rice crop. She has further referred to the incident that happened on 12.04.2025 as detailed in para No.10 of the petition, when respondents entered the house of the petitioner and threatened her and her family members either to vacate the land in question KOMAL 2025.05.19 17:29 I attest to the accuracy of this document CRWP-5146-2025 (O&M) -2- or they would demolish their house. She has also contended that on 13.04.2025, another false FIR had been registered on the allegations that the husband and son of the petitioner stealthily harvested their wheat crop from their land, so that they could harvest the wheat crop grown by the petitioner in their absence. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that she would be satisfied if the representation dated 16.04.2025 (Annexure P-10), which had already been moved by the petitioner is looked into. Notice of motion. Ms. Gagandeep Kaur, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice and submitted that she has no objection if the aforesaid representation dated 16.04.2025 (Annexure P-10) is looked into. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3, to look into the representation and to take appropriate action, if any required at the earliest. Disposed of. (SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE 19.05.2025. Komal Whether speaking/reasoned? : Yes/ No Whether reportable? : Yes/ No KOMAL 2025.05.19 17:29 I attest to the accuracy of this document