Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58820 (ALL)

SMT. RAJJO @ RAJRANI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

CRLRD/1652/2023 · 2025-07-07

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:108021 Court No. - 82 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 1652 of 2023 Revisionist :- Smt. Rajjo @ Rajrani Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Ayub Khan,Sanjay Agarwal Counsel for Opposite Party :- Ajay Sengar,Dileep Kumar Shukla,G.A.,Mohit Singh Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J. Order on delay condonation application 1. Case called out in revised list. None present on behalf of the revisionist. However, Sri Mohit Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no.4 and Sri Jhamman Ram, learned AGA-I for the State are present. 2. The instant revision is time barred by 276 days, which is pending since the year 2023 but today none is present to press the delay condonation application. 3. Further, from perusal of the affidavit filed in support of delay condonation application, it appears grounds taken in the affidavit appears to be vague. 4. Therefore, the delay condonation application filed by the revisionist is dismissed. Order on revision As delay condonation application filed by the revisionist has already been dismissed, therefore, instant revision also stands dismissed being time barred. Order Date :- 8.7.2025 AK Pandey Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad