Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58809 (DEL)

NUPOOR PAWA v. ISHANT SAINI

MAT.APP.(F.C.)/427/2025 · 2025-12-12

Anil Kshetarpal, Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 427/2025, CM APPL. 78757/2025 NUPOOR PAWA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Jatin Sehgal, Mr. Shivashish Dwivedi, Ms. Yashi Bajpai, Ms. Varsha Jain, Advs. versus ISHANT SAINI .....Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR O R D E R % 12.12.2025 CM APPL. 78759/2025[For condonation of delay in filing the appeal] 1. This is an application filed by the Appellant seeking condonation of delay of 34 days in filing the present Appeal. 2. For the reasons as stated in the application, the delay is condoned. 3. The application stands disposed of. CM APPL. 78758/2025[For exemption] 4. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 5. The application stands disposed of. MAT.APP.(F.C.) 427/2025, CM APPL. 78757/2025[For stay] 6. Through the present Appeal, the Appellant assails the correctness of the impugned order dated 04.10.2025 passed by the Family Court, whereby an application filed by the Respondent, seeking temporary custody and visitation rights of the minor son aged This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/12/2025 at 13:03:46 2 year, was allowed. The Family Court, while disposing of the said application, granted the Respondent visitation rights to meet the minor son for two hours, i.e. between 05:00 PM to 07:00 PM, twice on weekdays i.e. Monday and Thursday. 7. Learned counsel representing the Appellant submits that the visitation during two weekdays or working days creates disturbance not only in the life of the Appellant but also in the minor son’s. Learned counsel submits that the visitation rights should be restricted to once a week. 8. This Court has heard the submission made by the learned counsel representing the Appellant. 9. In the opinion of this Court, the Appellant, if so advised, may file an appropriate application before the Family Court for modification, while iterating the difficulties faced by the Appellant in giving visitation to the minor son twice on weekdays i.e. Monday and Thursday. 10. In the event such application is filed by the Appellant, the same shall be considered by the Family Court uninfluenced by the Impugned Order dated 04.10.2025. 11. With this observation, the present Appeal, along with the pending application, is disposed of. ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. DECEMBER 12, 2025 jai/kb This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/12/2025 at 13:03:46