Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58802 (AP)

SRI RUDRARAJU RAVI v. B SUNEEL KUMAR

CC/3592/2025 · 2025-11-27

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010628182025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3592/2025 Between: 1. SRI RUDRARAJU RAVI, S/O LATE R.NARAYANA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 58YEARS, OCC EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (PRI) KADAPA, R/O. DR.NO. 14-8/3, DHANALAKSHMI NAGAR, M.R.PALLI ROAD, TIRUPATI CITY, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. B SUNEEL KUMAR, S/o B.Danamanna, Aged about 41 years, Occ inspector of police. Anti Corruption Bureau, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondent for his wilful disobedience in filing the charge sheet/final report in FIR vide Cr.No.07/RCA-TCT/2023, dated 19-05-2023 at Police Station, Anti Corruption Bureau, Tirupati Range, Tirupati from the date of order in Crl.P.No.6647/2025 dated 01-07-2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G V V S VARA PRASAD Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. The Court made the following: 2 ORDER:- The present Contempt Case is filed alleging the non-compliance of the Order passed by this Court in Crl.P.No.6647 of 2025, dated 01.07.2025. 2. The learned counsel for the respondents submits that the charge sheet is yet to be filed. 3. Perused the record and the Order passed by this Court in Crl.P.No.6647 of 2025, dated 01.07.2025. 4. This Court in Crl.P.No.6647 of 2025, dated 01.07.2025, directed the respondents therein/IO to endeavour to file the final report/charge sheet as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three (03) months. Such direction is to be treated as suggestive in nature, keeping in view the urgency reported by the petitioner. Contempt alleging the non-compliance against such Orders cannot be entertained. 5. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 28.11.2025 SCH 3 551 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N Contempt Case No.3592 of 2025 Date: 28.11.2025 SCH