APHC010582432015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE Between: 1. PERAM CHINNA REDDY, S/O. SATYANARAYANA REDDY, R/O. 8 15, BALAJIRAOPET, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep., Court of AP. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S B SIVA Counsel for the Respondent: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following None appears on behalf of the Petitioner. Today, the matter is being listed under the caption “For Dismissal”. 2. It appears that against concurrent finding of an order of conviction by the learned Trial Court, the instant Criminal Revision Case has been preferred. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1564 OF 2015 PERAM CHINNA REDDY, S/O. SATYANARAYANA REDDY, R/O. 8 15, BALAJIRAOPET, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep.,by the Public Prosecutor, ...RESPONDENT the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following Order: None appears on behalf of the Petitioner. Today, the matter is being listed under the caption “For Dismissal”. against concurrent finding of an order of conviction by the learned Trial Court, the instant Criminal Revision Case has been IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3560] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA 2015 PERAM CHINNA REDDY, S/O. SATYANARAYANA REDDY, R/O. 8-1- ...PETITIONER by the Public Prosecutor, High ...RESPONDENT None appears on behalf of the Petitioner. Today, the matter is being against concurrent finding of an order of conviction by the learned Trial Court, the instant Criminal Revision Case has been 3. I have perused the order of sentence and conviction passed by the learned Trial Court as well as learned Appellate Court. 4. On careful observation of the findings, it appears that learned Trial Court has recorded the order of conviction and sentence against the present Petitioner by fixing several points for determination. The order of conviction has also mentioned the evidentiary value of the prosecution witnesses in detail and the documents placed by the prosecution has also been scanned. 5. On careful perusal of the observation of the learned Appellate Court, it appears that the Appellate Court has specifically decided the grounds of Appeal as mentioned by the Petitioner/ Appellant, he has also decided on the point for determination. I find no illegality and impropriety in the order itself. 6. Considering the same, I find no justification to interfere with the order of conviction passed by the learned Trial Court and confirmed by the learned Appellate Court. 7. Under the above observation, the instant Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as devoid of merit. The order of suspension of sentence passed by this Court during pendency of the instant Criminal Revision Case is hereby revoked. The Petitioner is directed to appear before the learned Trial Court within three (03) weeks from the date of passing of this order to serve out the remaining portion of sentence, failing which, learned Trial Court shall issue Non-Bailable Warrant against the present Petitioner to comply the order. Since the Petitioner is not present before this Court, let a copy of this order be served upon the learned Trial Court for ready reference. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J Date: 28.11.2025 Note: Issue C.C by 29.11.2025 B/o KK THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1564 OF 2015 28.11.2025 Note: Issue C.C by 29.11.2025 B/o KK