Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 202
CM-4592-CWP-2025 & CM-4593-CWP-2025 in/and CWP-18263-2013 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 24.07.2025 SHYAM SUNDER AND ANOTHER ... Petitioners VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. **** Present: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Vivek Chauhan, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL) CM-4592-CWP-2025
Allowed as prayed for.
The Annexures A-1 and A-2 are ordered to be taken on record subject to all just exceptions. Registry is directed to tag the same at appropriate place of the paper book.
CM-4593-CWP-2025 in/and CWP-18263-2013
Challenging the order dated 28.09.2012 (Annexure P-6) passed by respondent No.3, whereby the claim of the petitioners for regularization has RAJENDER KUMAR 2025.07.28 01:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order
CWP-18263-2013 (O&M)
-2- been declined without any basis. A further prayer has also been made for directing the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners for regularization of their services.
Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that under similar circumstances the respondents have already granted the benefit of regularization to similarly situated persons like the petitioners and certain directions have also been issued by this Court in favour of similarly placed persons vide different orders passed in CWP No.926 of 2013 titled as Virender Singh Versus State of Haryana and Others decided on 24.05.2024, CWP No.11138 of 2013 titled as Narender Chander and Others Versus State of Haryana and Others and CWP No.11525 of 2013 titled as Sukram Pal and Others Versus State of Haryana and Others both decided on 11.07.2024. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that at this juncture, he would be satisfied in case the respondents are
directed to reconsider the claim of the petitioners for seeking benefit of regularization on the ground of parity and in light of the orders passed by this Court in the matters referred to above.
Learned State Counsel has no objection to the same.
In view of the above, the application bearing No.CM-4593-CWP- 2025 is hereby allowed and the instant writ petition is hereby disposed of while setting aside the impugned order dated 28.09.2012 (Annexure P-6) at this juncture and directing the respondents to reconsider the claim of the petitioner for regularization in view of the orders/judgments passed by this Court in the matters referred to above and after considering as to whether the benefit of regularization has been granted to similarly placed persons or not.
RAJENDER KUMAR 2025.07.28 01:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order
CWP-18263-2013 (O&M)
-3-
Let the needful be done by the Competent Authority of the respondents within a period of four months of the receipt of certified copy of this order.
Disposed of in above terms.
All other misc. application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of accordingly.
(VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JULY 24, 2025.
JUDGE Rajender
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable
: Yes/No RAJENDER KUMAR 2025.07.28 01:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order