Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58786 (AP)

KANCHI RAMU v. SRI S SURESH KUMAR

CC/2560/2025 · 2025-11-27

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010489542025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2560/2025 Between: 1. KANCHI RAMU, S/O.KANCHI VENKATA SUBBAIAH, AGED 55 YEARS, R/O. FLATNO.502, 'A'BLOCK, MAHA-LAKSHMI RESIDENCY, NARAYANAPURAM, NEAR PADMAVATHI KALYANA MANDAPAM, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI S SURESH KUMAR, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. AGE MAJOR, OCC PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT, A.P SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. MS RAVURI VIDYULLATHA, D/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER AGE MAJOR, OCC DIRECTOR OF TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING, GOVT, OF ANDHRA PRADESH, GROUND FLOOR, MGM CAPITAL, BEHIND N.T.R VIDYA SEVA TRUST, NH-16 SERVICE ROAD, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 522503 3. SMT N MOURYA, , D/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER AGE MAJOR, OCC MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER OF TIRUPATHI TITUPATHI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to deal with the respondents herein, under Sec 10 to 12 of the 2 Contempt of the Courts Act, for his willful disobedience of the orders dated 04.08.2025 of this Hon'ble High Court in W.P.No.21760 of 2024, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P HEMACHANDRA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. The Court made the following: 3 Order:- The present Contempt Case is filed, aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in complying with the interim direction passed by this Court in W.P. No. 21760 of 2024, dated 04.08.2025. 2. It is submitted that subsequently, this Court has disposed of the above said writ petition on 07.11.2025. 3. In view of the same, the Contempt Case may be closed, leaving it open to the petitioner to file afresh, if so aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in not complying with the final order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 28.11.2025 PNS