Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5878 (KAR)

SMT PREMA SHRINIVAS LALEKAR v. SMT SAROJA W/O SATISH MIRAJKAR

RSA/100656/2020 · 2025-01-07

E S Indiresh

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:186 RSA No. 100656 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 100656 OF 2020 (DEC-) BETWEEN: SMT. PREMA SHRINIVAS LALEKAR, AGE: 56 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE HOLD, R/O: H.NO.238, RUKMINI NAGAR, ASHRAYA YOJANA SCHEME, NEAR AYYAPA SWAMI TEMPLE, BELAGAVI-590017. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. LAXMIKANT K. GURAV, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. SAROJA W/O. SATISH MIRAJKAR, AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: H.NO.706/B, PLOT NO.1 BLOCK, NEAR 2ND STAGE, RANI CHANNAMMA NAGAR, BELAGAVI-590006. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. MRUTYUNJAYA S. HALLIKERI, ADVOCATE) THIS RSA IS FILED U/SEC.100 OF CPC, PRAYING TO THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED IN ORIGINAL SUIT NO.452/2012 DATED 03.01.2019 BY THE HON’BLE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., COURT BELAGAVI MAY KINDLY BE SET ASIDE AND THE JUDGMENT PASSED BY THE II ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE COURT, BELAGAVI IN REGULAR APPEAL NO.21/2019 DATE 29.09.2020 MAY KINDLY BE SET ASIDE AND SUIT OF THE PLAINTIFF BEARING O.S.NO. 452/2012 MAY KINDLY BE DISMISSED WITH COSTS THROUGHOUT BY ALLOWING THE APPEAL. V N BADIGER Digitally signed by V N BADIGER Date: 2025.01.10 16:44:55 +0530 - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:186 RSA No. 100656 of 2020 THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL JUDGMENT A perusal of the order sheet would indicate that the appellant is consistently not representing the matter. When the matter was called in the morning, no representation was made on behalf of the appellant. However, learned counsel appearing for the respondent was present. Thereafter, the matter was passed over and called for the second time and as no representation has been made on behalf of the appellant, the appellant is not interested to prosecute the matter. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SH CT:ANB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28