Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58772 (AP)

MANGILIPUDI MURALI SREEDHAR REDDY v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/32415/2025 · 2025-11-20

D Ramesh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010624372025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 32415/2025 Between: 1. MANGILIPUDI MURALI SREEDHAR REDDY, S/O RAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O PLOT NO.LIG - 55, BAPUJI NAGAR, KAVALI, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRI SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, SINGARAYAKONDA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, PAKALA VILLAGE, SINGARAYAKONDA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction on part of the 4th respondent not considering the petitioner representation dated 29.09.2025 for mutation the petitioner name the revenue records and issuing 2 of pattadar passbook and title deed in my favour by the land an extent of Ac1- 15 cents in Sy,No.227-2 of Somarajupalli Village, Singarayakonda Mandal, Prakasam District and not mutation the petitioner name in Panchayat Records an extent of 36 Ankanamu vide D.No.1-66 in Sy.no.9-2 of Pakala village, Singarayakonda Mandal, Prakasam District as illegal, arbitrary, violative of the principles of natural justices and offends Articles 21 and 300 A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to incorporate the petitioner name by mutating name and issuing of pattadar passbook and title deed in favour of the petitioner in land revenue records and Panchayat records for the petitioner said subject property IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to consider and decide the petitioner's representations dated 29.09.2025 submitted by the petitioner, pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PAVANI SIVA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D. RAMESH WRIT PETITION No.32415 of 2025 ORDER:- This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed seeking to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 29.09.2025 for mutation of his name in the revenue records and issue pattadar passbook and title deed in his favour. 2. Today, when the case is taken up, the learned counsel for the petitioner limited his request to dispose of the representation submitted by the petitioner, dated 29.09.2025. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue readily agreed to dispose of the said representation in accordance with law. 4. Recording the submissions of the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to dispose of representation submitted by the petitioner, dated 29.09.2025 within four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently miscellaneous applications pending, if any in the Writ Petition, shall also stand closed. ____________ D.RAMESH,J Date: 21.11.2025 tm 4 5 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION No.32415 of 2025 Date : 21-11-2025 tm 6