Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58768 (AP)

A.Sudhakar Naidu, v. . The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/14286/2022 · 2025-11-19

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010222122022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14286/2022 Between: A.SUDHAKAR NAIDU, S/O.BAYYANNA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, HINDU, OCC AGRICULTURE, PAPANNAGARIPALLI, PEDAPALLI KOTHAPALLI VILLAGE NAMBULAPULAKUNATA MANDAL, ANANATAPUR DIST., A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINICPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUIDLINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, KADIRI CIRCLE POLICE STATION, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER S I OF POLICE, NAMBULAPULAKUNTA POLICE STATION, NAMBULAPULAKUNTA, NAMBULAPULAKUNTA MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 6. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 7. THE TAHASILDAR, NAMBULAPULAKUNTA MANDAL, NAMBULAPULAKUNTA, ANANTAPUR DIST., 8. THE GRAM PANCHAYAT, PEDAPALLI KOTHAPALLI VILLAGE, NAMBULAPULAKUNATA MANDAL, ANANATAPUR DIST., A.P. REP. BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETAIY, 9. PRERANA FOUNDATION, OFF 5, MADFAIYA, GARHA PURWA ROAD, NEAR DHANVANTRI NAGAR, JABALPUR, MADHYA PRADESH 10. SWARNALATHA, W/D/O.NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT MAJOR YEARS, OCC VOLUNTEER, PRERANA VOLUNTEER ORGANISATION, PRERANA FOUNDATION, 2 TEMPORARILY RESIDES WITH KUTHUBEE SAYED, EDIGA BAZAR, NAMBULAPULAKUNTA, NAMBULAPULAKUNTA MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. A P CELL NO.9441219117 11. KUTHUBEE SAYED, D/W/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER , AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCC VOLUNTEER WORKING WITH SWARNALATHA, PRERANA VOLUNTEER ORGANISATION, RESIDING IN THE HOUSE OF GUJIRI MABASHA (TENENT), EDIGA BAZAR, NAMBULAPULAKUNTA, NAMBULAPULAKUNTA MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. AP CELL NO.9390554608. 12. A BALAKRISHNA NAIDU, S/O.GENGI NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, PAPARMAGARIPALLI, PEDAPALLI KOTHAPALLI VILLAGE NAMBULAPULAKUNATA MANDAL, ANANATAPUR DIST., A.P. 13. A VEERABHADRA, S/O.BUDDANNA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, PAPANNAGARIPALLI, PEDAPALLI KOTHAPALLI VILLAGE, NAMBULAPULAKUNATA MANDAL, ANANATAPUR DIST., A.P. 14. A VEKATADRI, S/O.GENGI NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, PAPANNAGARIPALLI, PEDAPALLI KOTHAPALLI VILLAGE NAMBULAPULAKUNATA MANDAL, ANANATAPUR DIST., A.P. 15. PEDDAYAGARI LAKSHMI REDDY, S/O.RAJA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, OCC OWNER CUM DRIVER JCB NO.AP 39009009, REDDYVARIPALLI, NAMBULAPULA KUNTA MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 16. PEDDAYAGARI CHINNAPA REDDY, S/O.LAKSHMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC OWNER CUM DRIVER TRACTOR NO.AP 02 BF 7441, REDDYVARIPALLI, NAMBULAPULA KUNTA MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. RESPONDENTS. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P SREE RAMULU NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3. V VINOD K REDDY (SC FOR ZP MPDO GP) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: 3 “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents more particularly of the respondent Nos. 3 to 5 in not taking any action against the respondent Nos.10 to 16 based on complaints dated 19.03.2022 to the 5th respondent 21.03.2022 to the 3rd and 6th respondents, 24.03.2022 to the respondent Nos. 4th and 7th respondents and 04.04.2022 to the 5th respondent and also the representations dated 30.05.2018 to the respondent Nos. 3, 4, 6 and 7 of the petitioner and registering of the cases is illegal arbitrary, unjust unconstitutional and violative of Article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and Constitutional Right guaranteed under Art. 300-A of the Constitution of India and Human Rights.” 2. None represented for the Petitioner. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:20.11.2025 Dinesh 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.14286 of 2022 Dt.20.11.2025 Dinesh