APHC010185922017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 10611/2017 Between: 1. YELISETTY SHREE DATTA GURUDEVA GUPTA, S/O. Y. VENKATA SATYANARAYANA, AGE 23 YEARS, R/O. H.NO.45/142A-7-5, ROAD NO.4, VENKATARAMANA COLONY, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS, Rep. by its Regional Passport officer, Hyderabad, D.No.8-2-215 to 219, Kummarguda, Secunderabad, Telangana. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue a Writ, One in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India declaring the inaction of the respondent in not processing the application for renewal of passport of with correct date of birth as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent to process the Petitioner's Application No.HY2068736129315 dated 11.08.2015 and issue Passport with correct date of birth as 01.07.1994 forthwith and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 13159 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondent to consider the application No.HY2068736129315 dated 2 JS,J W.P.No.10611/2017 11.08.2015 for renewal of passport with correct date of birth as 01.07.1994 pending disposal of the writ petition and pass IA NO: 4 OF 2017(WPMP 60386 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. C RAMA SUBBA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. THENEPALLI NIRANJAN SC FOR CENTRAL. GOVT 3 JS,J W.P.No.10611/2017 The Court made the following ORDER: No representation for the petitioner. On the earlier occasions also i.e., on 14.08.2025, 10.09.2025 and 12.11.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the case. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed as non-prosecution. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 21.11.2025 SCH 4 JS,J W.P.No.10611/2017 303 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 10611/2017 Dated: 21.11.2025 SCH