2025:KER:28274 W.A.No.598 of 2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. NITIN JAMDAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.MANU FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 7TH CHAITHRA, 1947 WA NO. 598 OF 2025 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 25.3.2025 IN WP(C) NO.38280 OF 2024 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA APPELLANT/PETITIONER IN WPC: ORION ENTERPRISES REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, ARIF K , AGE 49 YEARS, S/O SAIDALI(LATE), 15/355Q, OPP. POST OFFICE, TIRUR ROAD, DOWN HILL PO, MALAPPURAM DT, KERALA, PIN – 676 519 BY ADVS. M.R. HARIRAJ, SR. ANAND B. MENON HARIS BEERAN AZHAR ASSEES O.A.NURIYA RESPONDENT S / RE S PONDENTS IN WPC : 1 DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER MANAGER, SOUTHERN RAILWAY, TRIVANDRUM DIVISION, TRIVANDRUM, PIN – 695 014 2 SR. DIVISIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEER MANAGER, SOUTHERN RAILWAY, TRIVANDRUM DIVISION, TRIVANDRUM, PIN - 695014 3 SR. DIVISIONAL FINANCE MANAGER MANAGER, SOUTHERN RAILWAY, TRIVANDRUM DIVISION, TRIVANDRUM, PIN - 695014 BY ADV S. BIJU THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: 2025:KER:28274 W.A.No.598 of 2025 2 JUDGMENT Dated this the 28th day of March, 2025 Nitin Jamdar, C.J. Heard Mr. M.R. Hariraj, learned Senior Advocate for the Appellant and Mr. S. Biju, learned Senior Central Government Counsel for the Respondents. 2. The appeal challenges an interim order passed by the learned Single Judge. It is informed that pursuant to the fresh tender, contract has been entered into with the third party, that is, M/s. Tharu & Sons, having its Registered Office at Paracka House, Door No.420/2 of Kalamassery Municipality, Karipayi Road, Thrikkakkara North Village, Njalakom Desom, Kalamassery, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District, Kerala, Rajagiri P.O., Pin – 683 104. The learned counsel for the Appellant states that instead of pursuing this appeal in light of this development, the party with whom contract has been entered into by the Respondent Authority pursuant to the fresh tender process, will be joined as a Party Respondent in the writ petition, the writ petition would be amended and necessary prayers would be sought. 3. In view of this position, the appeal is disposed of. Sd/- Nitin Jamdar Chief Justice Sd/- S. Manu Judge vpv