Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58755 (AP)

J. RAMA MOHAN RAO v. M. ANGAMUTHU, IAS

CC/2841/2025 · 2025-11-20

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010500822025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2841/2025 Between: 1. J. RAMA MOHAN RAO, S/O.VENKATA SATYANARAYANA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.10 COMPUTERS, RAMA NAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM. 1. M ANGAMUTHU IAS, CHAIRMAN, THE VISAKHAPATNAM PORT TRUST, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. CH RAM PRASAD, THE CHIEF MECHANICAL ENGINEER, VISAKHAPATNAM PORT TRUST, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, VISAKHAPATNAM. Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein be pleased to punish the Respondents herein categorical and mandatory orders passed by W.P.No.13200 of 2012, dated 23.01.20 Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein to implement the orders of this Hon IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2841/2025 J. RAMA MOHAN RAO, S/O.VENKATA SATYANARAYANA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.10-37-15/2, NEARN.I.L.T. COMPUTERS, RAMA NAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND M ANGAMUTHU IAS, CHAIRMAN, THE VISAKHAPATNAM PORT VISAKHAPATNAM. CH RAM PRASAD, THE CHIEF MECHANICAL ENGINEER, VISAKHAPATNAM PORT TRUST, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may punish the Respondents herein for willfully violating the clear, and mandatory orders passed by this HonbLe Court in W.P.No.13200 of 2012, dated 23.01.2025 under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and pass Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to espondents herein to implement the orders of this Hon IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3457] J. RAMA MOHAN RAO, S/O.VENKATA SATYANARAYANA, HINDU, 15/2, NEARN.I.L.T. ...PETITIONER M ANGAMUTHU IAS, CHAIRMAN, THE VISAKHAPATNAM PORT CH RAM PRASAD, THE CHIEF MECHANICAL ENGINEER, VISAKHAPATNAM PORT TRUST, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying the High Court may violating the clear, this HonbLe Court in 25 under Sections 10 to 12 of Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to espondents herein to implement the orders of this Hon’ble Court 2 passed in Writ Petition 13200/2012 23.01.2025 and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SAIRAM MURTHY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. P SRI RAM 2. The Court made the following: 3 Order:- The learned counsel for the respondents submits that a Speaking Order dated 03.11.2025 was passed duly informing the petitioner that the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.13200 of 2012, dated 23.01.2025, have been complied with and that the payments due towards gratuity together with interest, commutation of pension and additional benefits have been made. The relevant proceedings are filed, and the same would indicate adequate compliance of the orders passed by this Court and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case. 2. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 21.11.2025 PNS