APHC010577092025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 29809/2025 Between: 1. UNDAVALLI ADINARAYANA RAO, S/O VEERA RAGHAVAIAH AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/O PEDAKADIMI VILLAGE, PEDAVEGI MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, PEDAVEGI MANDAL ELURU DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not implementing the names of the petitioner and his family members in the revenue records as title holders and name of the Pedakadimi Panchayati as occupier for the lands situated in Sy.No.872/2 (Old Sy.No.572/2) to an extent of Ac.0.21 cents of Pedakadimi Village, Pedavegi Mandal, Eluru District, pursuant to Proceedings In Roc.No.375/2025/Dt.24.07.2025 on the file of the 2nd respondent is highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and in violation of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to implement the name of the petitioner and 2 his family members in the revenue records as title holders and name of the Pedakadimi Panchayati as occupier for the lands situated in Sy.No.872/2 (Old Sy.No.572/2) to an extent of Ac.0.21 cents of Pedakadimi Village, Pedavegi Mandal, Eluru District, pursuant to Proceedings In Roc.No.375/2025/Dt.24.07.2025 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to implement the name of the petitioner and his family members in the revenue records as title holders and name of the Pedakadimi Panchayati as occupier for the lands situated in Sy.No.872/2 (Old Sy.No.572/2) to an extent of Ac.0.21 cents of Pedakadimi Village, Pedavegi Mandal, Eluru District, pursuant to Proceedings In Roc.No.375/2025/Dt:24.07.2025 pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V V N NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: The present Writ Petition is filed, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: “to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or an appropriate writ or order declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not implementing the names of the petitioner and his family members in the revenue records as title holders and name of the Pedakadimi Panchayati as occupier for the lands situated in Sy.No.872/2 (Old Sy.No.572/2) to an extent of Ac.0.21 cents of Pedakadimi Village, Pedavegi Mandal, Eluru District, pursuant to Proceedings In Roc.No.375/2025/Dt.24.07.2025 on the file of the 2nd respondent is highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and in violation of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to implement the name of the petitioner and his family members in the revenue records as title holders and name of the Pedakadimi Panchayati as occupier for the lands situated in Sy.No.872/2 (Old Sy.No.572/2) to an extent of Ac.0.21 cents of Pedakadimi Village, Pedavegi Mandal, Eluru District, pursuant to Proceedings In Roc.No.375/2025/Dt.24.07.2025 and pass...” 2. Heard M/s V.V.N.Narayana Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondents. 3. Without going into the merits of the case, on instructions, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondents submitted that though the orders were passed on the application dated 24.7.2025 of the petitioner, but for implementation, the petitioner has to make on- line application and if the application is submitted on-line the authorities will implement the same. 4 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will apply through on-line. 5. Considering the same, liberty is given to the petitioner to make on-line application, within a period of two (02) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order and on filing such application, the authorities may consider and take appropriate action within one (01) months thereafter. 6. With the above observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending, if any, in the writ petition, shall also stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH 20.11.2025 RD 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION No.29809 of 2025 20.11.2025 RD