Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58748 (MAD)

V.RAGAMANI v. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

WP/16950/2024 · 2025-03-04

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.16950 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 04.03.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P.No.16950 of 2024 V.Ragamani ... Petitioner -Vs- 1. The Superintendent of Police, Namakkal District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Nallur Police Station, Namakkal District. 3. Subramani ...Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to provide sufficient police protection to the petitioner herein and petitioner family members for their life and the property existing in SF.No.5/3, Thevanampalayam village, paramathi velur Taluk, Namakkal District by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 12.06.2024. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Nalliyappan For R1 and R2 : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.side) For R3 : Mr.C.Jagadish O RDER https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.16950 of 2024 This Writ Petition has been filed for direction directing the respondents 1 and 2 to provide sufficient police protection to the petitioner herein and petitioner family members for their life and the property existing in SF.No.5/3, Thevanampalayam village, Paramathi Velur Taluk, Namakkal District by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 12.06.2024. 2. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 submitted that based on the complaint given by the petitioner, the enquiry has been conducted in CSR No.114 of 2024 and the same has been closed. 4. It is seen that there is a dispute between the petitioner and the third respondent. That apart, the Police Protection can be granted only to the life and limb of a person. Therefore, the Police protection cannot be granted for property. However, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the civil Court for appropriate relief. 5. In view of the above, the direction sought for in this petition cannot be considered. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.16950 of 2024 04.03.2025 Internet: Yes Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking order mn To 1. The Superintendent of Police, Namakkal District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Nallur Police Station, Namakkal District. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN. J, mn https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.16950 of 2024 W.P.No.16950 of 2024 04.03.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis