IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 121 Jaswinder Singh State of Punjab and CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present :- Mr. Mr. Saurav Verma, Addl. AG, Punjab. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The present multiple inquiries by the res Pursuant to the directions issued by this Court, an affidavit of Dilpreet Singh, IPS, Superintendent of Police (Headquarter), District Sangrur 08.09.2025. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that in view of the averments contain respondents have parties was with regard to possession of the land and there is no criminal offence that took place at the spot, he does not press stage. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of as not pressed. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 22.09.2025 Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-30117 Date of decision: Jaswinder Singh VERSUS and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Mr. G.S. Nahel, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Saurav Verma, Addl. AG, Punjab. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed multiple inquiries by the respondents-authorities. Pursuant to the directions issued by this Court, an affidavit of Dilpreet Singh, IPS, Superintendent of Police (Headquarter), District Sangrur on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4 Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that in view of the averments contained in para No.23 of the said affidavit, wherein, the have specifically admitted that the basic dispute between the parties was with regard to possession of the land and there is no criminal offence that took place at the spot, he does not press In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of as not Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 30117-2025(O&M) Date of decision: 22.09.2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondents VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Saurav Verma, Addl. AG, Punjab. aggrieved of the initiation of Pursuant to the directions issued by this Court, a reply by way of an affidavit of Dilpreet Singh, IPS, Superintendent of Police (Headquarter), on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4 had been filed on Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that in view of the ed in para No.23 of the said affidavit, wherein, the specifically admitted that the basic dispute between the parties was with regard to possession of the land and there is no criminal offence that took place at the spot, he does not press the present petition at this In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of as not Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2025.09.23 14:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document