APHC010611712025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 31824/2025 Between: KURAGANTI MERI BABU, S/O MANIKYA RAO, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O 5-20, CRISTIAN COLONY, AMARAVATHI,PANADU DISTRICT. ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, AMARAVATHI POLICE STATION, AMARAVATHI, PALNADU DISTRICT ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. RAJA SEKHAR, SUB INSPECTOR, AMARAVATHI POLICE STATION, AMARAVATHI, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. KURAGANTI LAKSHMI, W/O MERI BABU, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE. DOOR NO 4-12, SC COLONY, MALLADI VILLAGE, AMARAVATHI MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KRANTHI KUMAR PASUMARTHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: 2 “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd and 4th respondents in involving in family issues and illegally detained the petitioner hours together and pressurised the petitioner to give divorce to the 5th respondent is illegal and contrary to the fundament principles enshrined in the constitution and consequently direct to the 3rd and 4th respondents not to involve in family issues and not to harass the petitioner to give divorce to the 5th respondent.” 2. Sri Pasumarthi Kranthi Kumar, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Police are interfering with the family disputes between the Petitioner and the unofficial Respondent. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that, basing on the complaint given by Respondent No.5, the Petitioner was called to the Police Station for enquiry, however, no crime is registered against the Petitioner. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Police are directed not to interfere in the family disputes between the Petitioner and Respondent No.5, except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:20.11.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.31824 of 2025 Dt.20.11.2025 Dinesh