IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45138 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-87 Year-2021 Thana- DANAPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Dipu Kumar @ Abhay Ranjan S/O Late Digri Prasad Sinha Resident of Anand bazar, P.s.- Danapur, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Ms. Vaishnavi Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jagdhar Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 06-08-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 326, 307, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that this petitioner, who happens to be brother-in-law of son of informant and his friend, namely Bablu Kumar, caused fire arm injury to informant. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Bare perusal of the F.I.R. depicts that the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45138 of 2025(2) dt.06-08-2025 2/3 same was lodged against unknown persons but in the fard beyan, suspicion was raised against this petitioner. Police after due investigation submitted charge-sheet against other accused persons, namely Sanjiv Kumar @ Bablu, Sunil Kumar and Ranjan Pradeep Kumar and final form was submitted against this petitioner. However, differing with the same, the learned trial court under Section 319 of the Cr.P.C. has summoned this petitioner on the basis of vague suspicion raised by the informant. Petitioner claims clean antecedents. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, material that has surfaced during course of investigation and clean antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed. 7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-V, Danapur in connection with Danapur P.S. Case No. 87 of 2021, Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45138 of 2025(2) dt.06-08-2025 3/3 subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.. shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T