Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58717 (AP)

SMT. YADLA HYMAVATHI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/16223/2022 · 2025-11-20

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Dr.VJP,J W.P.No.16223 of 2022 APHC010270082022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 16223 OF 2022 Between: 1. SMT. YADLA HYMAVATHI, W/o. Yadla Chinnam Naidu, Hindu, Female, aged about 45 years, Occ. Home maker, Residing at D. No. 6-205/1, Rayavaram Village, Rayavaram (M), East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh ...Petitioner AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, AP Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh 2. The Station House Officer, Rayavaram Police Station, Rayavaram Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh 3. SubInspector of Police, Rayavaram Police Station, Rayavaram Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh 4. Salumuri Venkatesh Venkateswara Rao, S/o Suryarao, aged about 40 years, Occ. Photographer and Videographer, D.No.7-93, Opp.Velamapeta Ramalayam, Rayavaram (V). Rayavaram (M). East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh ...Respondents Dr.VJP,J W.P.No.16223 of 2022 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ or Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 2nd and 3rd Respondents in interfering with the peaceful possession of the property situated in D. No. 6-205/1, Rayavaram Village, Rayavaram Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh as illegal, arbitrary and unlawful and consequently direct the Respondents not to interfere with the repair works of the house property or to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: SURESH KUMAR ROUTHU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents:A K KISHORE REDDY Dr.VJP,J W.P.No.16223 of 2022 The Court made the following ORDER: 1. This Writ Petition is filed with the following prayer: “…to issue an appropriate Writ or Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 2nd and 3rd Respondents in interfering with the peaceful possession of the property situated in D. No. 6-205/1, Rayavaram Village, Rayavaram Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh as illegal, arbitrary and unlawful and consequently direct the Respondents not to interfere with the repair works of the house property… 2. Heard Sri Suresh Kumar Routhu, learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. In that view, this Court is not inclined to interfere and take any decision over the matter which is pending before competent civil court. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 21.11.2025 Dvs Dr.VJP,J W.P.No.16223 of 2022 Dr.VJP,J W.P.No.16223 of 2022 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 144 WRIT PETITION NO: 16223 OF 2022 Date: 21.11.2025 Dvs