Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:111605 Court No. - 82 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 5707 of 2023 Revisionist :- Dilip Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Vishnu Kant Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Renu Devi Dohre Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J. 1. None appeared on behalf of revisionist even in revised call. 2. The instant revision is pending since the year 2023, therefore, the same is being disposed of finally. 3. Heard Ms. Renu Devi Dohre, learned counsel for O.P. Nos.2 & 3 and Sri Vijay Bahadur Maurya, learned AGA for the State. 4. The instant revision U/s 397/401 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the revisionist to set aside the impugned judgment and order dated 19.10.2023 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Jalaun at Orai in Case No. 87 of 2021 (Smt. Khushbu Verma and anothers Vs. Dilip Singh) under Section 125 Cr.P.C., Police Station-Jalaun, District-Jalaun.. 5. Learned counsel for O.P. Nos. 2 & 3 and learned AGA submitted that instant revision has been filed by the revisionist against the impugned order dated 19.10.2023 by which application moved by O.P. Nos. 2 & 3 U/s 125 Cr.P.C. was allowed and revisionist was directed to pay Rs. 3,000/- per month to O.P. No.2 and Rs. 2,000/- per month to O.P. No. 3 as maintenance allowance. 6. They further submitted that there is no illegality in the impugned order dated 19.10.2023 and after considering entire facts of the case in detail, court concerned passed the same. 7. They further submitted that revisionist is husband of O.P. No.2 and father of O.P.No.3 therefore, it is his legal obligation to maintain them. 8. They further submitted that therefore, the instant revision is devoid of merit and is liable to be dismissed. 9. I heard learned counsel for O.P. Nos. 2 &3 and learned AGA and perused the record of the case. 10. By way of instant revision, revisionist challenged the impugned order dated 19.10.2023 by which he was directed to pay maintenance allowance to his wife and daughter i.e. O.P. Nos. 2 & 3 respectively. 11. From the impugned order dated 19.10.2023, it reflects, it is well reasoned order and while passing the same, court concerned considered all the facts and in view of this Court, there is no reason to interfere with the finding of facts recorded by the court concerned. 12. Further, maintenance allowance awarded to O.P. Nos. 2 & 3 cannot be said to be excessive. 13. Therefore, considering the facts of the case, in my view, the instant revision filed by revisionist is devoid of merit and is hereby dismissed. Order Date :- 11.7.2025 KK Patel Digitally signed by :- KRISHN KANT PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad