[2025:RJ-JP:5606] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1764/2025 Jakar S/o Niwaj Kha, R/o Jhanjhar, Police Station Sikri, District Deeg. ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 07/02/2025 1. This anticipatory bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner u/S 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 18/2024 registered at police station Sikri, District Deeg for offences u/S 143, 323, 341 & 336 IPC. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made at bar and also perused the charge-sheet. 4. It is borne out that there is a case of free fight between the petitioner and the complainant and there are cross-cases registered by them against each other. Co-accused persons have already been enlarged by this Court’s order dated 10.12.2024. 5. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that there are cross cases between both parties and co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail, this Court without expressing any opinion [2025:RJ-JP:5606] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1764/2025] on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the accused petitioner. 7. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O./I.O./Arresting Authority, Police Station Sikri, District Deeg in F.I.R. No. 18/2024 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner, she shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without prior permission of the court. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J GAURAV SRIVASTAVA /14