Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5871 (ORI)

RITESH NATH v. STATE OF ODISHA

ABLAPL/13916/2025 · 2026-04-16

R K Pattanaik

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 13916 of 2025 Ritesh Nath …. Petitioner Mr. K.K. Pahil, Advocate -Versus- State of Orissa …. Opposite Party Mr. M.K. Mohanty, ASC Mr. D. Mishra, Advocate for the informant CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK Order No. ORDER 02.05.2026 I.A. No.689 of 2026 05. 1. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. Instant I.A. is filed seeking modification of one of the conditions of the order in the ABLAPL for the reason stated. 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the parents of the petitioner do not have any property, hence, therefore, the Court’s order in the ABLAPL dated 16th April, 2026 is required to be modified dispensing with the condition imposed in that regard as one of them directed to stand as a surety. 4. Recorded the response of the State. 5. For the reason stated therein, the Court is inclined to exempt such a condition to be complied with by the petitioner p. 2 and hence, the I.A. is allowed. Consequently, the condition to furnish a solvent surety by one of the parents of the petitioner is dispensed with. Rest part of the order remains unaltered for compliance. Furthermore, the petitioner is allowed fifteen days more to commence from today to surrender before the learned court below complying the order in the ABLAPL. 6. Urgent copy of this order be issued as per rules. (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge Rojina Designation: Junior Stenographer