Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58683 (AP)

SALAPU RAJU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/28851/2022 · 2025-11-19

B Krishna Mohan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010475102022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 28851/2022 Between: 1. SALAPU RAJU, S/O LATE MUTYALU, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,R/O . 2- 7/B, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PHARMACITY, SALAPUVANIPALEM, MAREDIPUDI POST, THADI, PARAWADA MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 2. JAJULA RAVANAMMA, W/O LATE APPA RAO, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O 30-36-14/1, LAKSHMIPURAM COLONY,VADLAPUDI RH COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. SALAPU RAMU, W/O LATE SANNIBABU, AGED 51 YEARS, R/O 1-83/A, SALAPUVANIPALEM, MAREDIPUDI POST, THADI, PARAWADA MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 4. SIYYADRI VENKATA LAKSHMI, W/O LATE APPARAO, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O 2-83/2, SALAPUVANIPALEM, MAREDIPUDI POST, THADI, PARAWADA MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 5. SALAPU HEMALATHA, W/O KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O 2-28, SALAPUVANIPALEM, MAREDIPUDI POST THADI, PARAWADA MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPTD., BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, ANAKAPALLI. 2 HBKM,J W.P.No.28851 of 2022 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ANAKAPALLI. 5. THE TAHSILDAR, PARAWADA MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 6. SALAPU SANKARA RAO, S/O LATE RAMA RAO, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O SALAPUVANIPALEM POST, MAREDIPUDI, H/O THADI, PARAWADA MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 7. B MADHAVI LATHA, W/O SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, AGED 65 YEARS, R/O SALAPUVANIPALEM, THADI VILLAGE, PARAWADA MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 8. SINNAM KUMARI SATYAVATHI, W/O VERESH, HINDU, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O 50-121-30, SEETHAMMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 9. GOPISETTI VENKATA RAMANA, S/O LATE SATYANARAYANA, 62 YEARS, R/O 5/176, SHARADANAGAR, ANAKAPALLI. 10. VADAPALLI SRINIVASA RAO DIED AS PER L RS RR 11 TO 13, S/O LATE SEETHARAMA MURTHY, HINDU, RESIDENT OF 1/13, MAIN STREET, SOPERU, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 11. VADAPALLI NARMADA W/O LATE SRI SRINIVASA RAO, HINDU, AGE 36 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O DOOR NO.1-71/1, SOPERU - 532 148, RAJAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 12. VADAPALLI RISHITHA D/O LATE SRI SRINIVASA RAO, HINDU, OCC STUDENT, BEING MINOR, REP BY HER MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN, R/O DOOR NO.1-71/1, SOPERU -532 148, RAJAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 13. VADAPALLI RAMA CHANDRA KOWSHIK S/O LATE SRI SRINIVASA RAO, HINDU, OCC STUDENT, BEING MINOR, REP BY HIS MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN, R/O DOOR NO.1-71/1, SOPERU -532 148, RAJAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. RR 11 TO 13 ARE BROUGHT ON RECORD AS L.RS OF THE DECEASED 10TH RESPONDENT AS PER THE COURT'S ORDER DT.01.09.2025 IN I.A.NO.02 OF 2022. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in passing the 3 HBKM,J W.P.No.28851 of 2022 order vide D.Dis. No. 696/2015/C dated 26/03/2022 as wholly devoid of jurisdiction, apart from being vitiated by non-application of mind, illegal, capricious and violative of the provisions of the RoR Act 1971 as well as the AP (AA) Inams (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act 1956 and violative of article 14,21 and 300-A of constitution of india and consequently set aside the order vide D.Dis. No. 696/2015/C dated 26- 03-2022 passed by the 4th respondent and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order vide D.Dis. No. 696/2015/C dated 26-03-2022 passed by the 4th respondent and direct the 4th respondent to restore the names of petitioners in respective record of rights(ROR) entries as exsisted prior to the passing of order dated 26-03-2022 in vide D.Dis. No. 696/2015/C pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to permit the Petitioners herein to come on record as Respondent No. 11 to 13 respectively in W.P,No 28851 of 2022. being the Legal Representatives of the deceased 10th Respondent and permit them to prosecute the Writ Petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the interim order dated 8.9.2022 in WP.No.28851/2022 in IA 1/22 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. PILLIX LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GNANI VIVEK KARRA 2. N SIVA REDDY 3. GP FOR REVENUE 4 HBKM,J W.P.No.28851 of 2022 The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN Dt : 20.11.2025 sj 5 HBKM,J W.P.No.28851 of 2022 126 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 28851/2022 Dt : 20.11.2025 sj